Legal Proof: Fixed or Flexible?

In The Philosophy of Legal Proof. Cambridge University Press (2024)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Discusses the idea that legal proof should use variable standards rather than a single fixed threshold.

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

Standards of Proof.Lewis Ross - 2024 - In The Philosophy of Legal Proof. Cambridge University Press.
Criminal Proof: Fixed or Flexible?Lewis Ross - 2023 - Philosophical Quarterly (4):1-23.
Should Legal Proof Be Binary?Lewis Ross - 2024 - In The Philosophy of Legal Proof. Cambridge University Press.
The Reasonable and the Relevant: Legal Standards of Proof.Georgi Gardiner - 2019 - Philosophy and Public Affairs 47 (3):288-318.
Legal Burdens of Proof and Statistical Evidence.Georgi Gardiner - 2018 - In David Coady & James Chase (eds.), Routledge Handbook of Applied Epistemology. New York: Routledge, Taylor & Francis Group.
The Philosophy of Legal Proof.Lewis Ross - 2024 - Cambridge University Press.
Rethinking Criminal Law. [REVIEW]Andrew Botterell - 2009 - Canadian Journal of Law and Jurisprudence 22 (1):93-112.
Knowledge and Legal Proof.Sarah Moss - forthcoming - Oxford Studies in Epistemology.
Legal Probabilism and Anti-Probabilism.Lewis Ross - 2024 - In The Philosophy of Legal Proof. Cambridge University Press.

Analytics

Added to PP
2024-05-21

Downloads
166 (#140,686)

6 months
93 (#67,226)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references