Why content must be a matter of truth conditions

Philosophical Quarterly 39 (156):257-275 (1989)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

It is argued that if, with Dummett, we see assertion as an act governed by conditions of correctness which makes a claim to the effect that these conditions are met, then the conditions of correctness that determine its content must have the impersonal character of a requirement of truth, rather than the speaker-relative character of a requirement of justification or assertibility. For otherwise it would be impossible for different speakers to use the same words to make an assertion with the same content.

Other Versions

No versions found

Similar books and articles

Relative Correctness.Teresa Marques - 2014 - Philosophical Studies 167 (2):361-373.
Assertion and Conditionals.Peter Carruthers - 1986 - Philosophical Quarterly 36 (145):566.
Asking Questions of Nature.Donald Mark Bauder - 1991 - Dissertation, The University of Wisconsin - Madison
Terminological reflections of an enlightened contextualist. [REVIEW]Robert J. Stainton - 2006 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 73 (2):460–468.
Assertion and Conditionals.Anthony Appiah - 2008 - Cambridge University Press.
Self-knowledge and Moore's paradox.David M. Rosenthal - 1995 - Philosophical Studies 77 (2-3):195 - 209.
Thing talk moonlighting.Mark Crimmins - 2002 - Philosophical Studies 108 (1-2):83 - 98.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
601 (#45,511)

6 months
88 (#70,030)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Angus Ross
University of East Anglia

Citations of this work

Rationality and the Reactive Attitudes.Angus Ross - 2008 - European Journal of Analytic Philosophy 4 (1):45-58.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references