A note on Anselm's ontological argument

Mind 79 (314):270-271 (1970)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

DOI

10.1093/mind/lxxix.314.270

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 100,865

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

What part of Fides Quaerens don’t you Intellectum ? On the Persistent Philosophical Misunderstanding of Anselm’s Ontological Argument.Derek A. Michaud - manuscript
Review: Daniel A. Dombrowski: Rethinking the Ontological Argument: A Neoclassical Theistic Response. [REVIEW]G. Oppy - 2008 - Mind 117 (467):690-693.
The modal ontological argument.R. Kane - 1984 - Mind 93 (371):336-350.
The relevance of Kant's objection to Anselm's ontological argument.Chris Heathwood - 2011 - Religious Studies 47 (3):345-357.
On behalf of Gaunilo.B. Garrett - 2013 - Analysis 73 (3):481-482.
Reality and existence in Anselm.Stephen Priest - 2000 - Heythrop Journal 41 (4):461–462.
Response to Gettings.G. Oppy - 2000 - Analysis 60 (4):363-367.
The ontological argument and Russell's antinomy.Sara L. Uckelman - 2009 - Logic and Logical Philosophy 18 (3-4):309-312.
Understanding Anselm's Ontological Argument.Guy Jackson - 2023 - Springer Nature Switzerland.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
65 (#324,727)

6 months
8 (#575,465)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Existing by Convention.Kenneth G. Ferguson - 1992 - Religious Studies 28 (2):185 - 194.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references