Genetic Privacy and Confidentiality: Why They are So Hard to Protect

Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 26 (3):198-204 (1998)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Genetic privacy and confidentiality have both intrinsic and consequential value. Although general agreement exists about the need to protect privacy and confidentiality in the abstract, most of the concern has focused on preventing the harmful uses of this sensitive information. I hope to demonstrate in this article that the reason why genetic privacy and confidentiality are so difficult to protect is that any effort to protect them inevitably implicates broader and extremely contentious issues, such as the right of access to health care. Moreover, the tentative legislative and policy steps undertaken and proposed thus far have been, for the most part, misguided, simplistic, and ineffective.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 103,401

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2010-08-31

Downloads
67 (#327,291)

6 months
8 (#390,329)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Expanding the Ethical Analysis of Biobanks.Mark A. Rothstein - 2005 - Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 33 (1):89-101.
Currents in Contemporary Bioethics.Mark A. Rothstein - 2012 - Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 40 (2):394-400.
Genetic Exceptionalism and Legislative Pragmatism.Mark A. Rothstein - 2007 - Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 35 (S2):59-65.
Currents in Contemporary Ethics.Mary R. Anderlik & Mark A. Rothstein - 2003 - Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 31 (3):450-454.

View all 10 citations / Add more citations

References found in this work

The Supreme Court Confronts HIV: Reflections on Bragdon v. Abbott.Wendy E. Parmet - 1998 - Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 26 (3):225-240.

Add more references