- New
-
Topics
- All Categories
- Metaphysics and Epistemology
- Value Theory
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Logic and Philosophy of Logic
- Philosophy of Biology
- Philosophy of Cognitive Science
- Philosophy of Computing and Information
- Philosophy of Mathematics
- Philosophy of Physical Science
- Philosophy of Social Science
- Philosophy of Probability
- General Philosophy of Science
- Philosophy of Science, Misc
- History of Western Philosophy
- Philosophical Traditions
- Philosophy, Misc
- Other Academic Areas
- Journals
- Submit material
- More
Is Deidentification Sufficient to Protect Health Privacy in Research?
American Journal of Bioethics 10 (9):3-11 (2010)
Abstract
This Article does not have an abstractOther Versions
No versions found
My notes
Similar books and articles
Why Deidentification Fails Research Subjects and Researchers.Robert Gellman - 2010 - American Journal of Bioethics 10 (9):28-30.
Managing Patient Expectations About Deidentification.Harald Schmidt & Shawneequa L. Callier - 2010 - American Journal of Bioethics 10 (9):21-23.
Electronic Health Records and Research: Privacy Versus Scientific Priorities.Sharona Hoffman - 2010 - American Journal of Bioethics 10 (9):19-20.
Guiding Deidentification Forward.Melissa M. Goldstein - 2010 - American Journal of Bioethics 10 (9):27-28.
Deidentification and Its Discontents: Response to the Open Peer Commentaries.Mark A. Rothstein - 2010 - American Journal of Bioethics 10 (9):W1-W2.
Addressing privacy concerns through the health insurance portability and accountability act privacy rule.Sharona Hoffman - 2007 - American Journal of Bioethics 7 (3):48 – 49.
“Human Non-Subjects Research”: Privacy and Compliance.Kyle Bertram Brothers & Ellen Wright Clayton - 2010 - American Journal of Bioethics 10 (9):15-17.
Judging public health research: Epistemology, public health and the law.Matthew K. Wynia - 2005 - American Journal of Bioethics 5 (6):4 – 7.
Privacy Overkill.Rosamond Rhodes & Daniel A. Moros - 2010 - American Journal of Bioethics 10 (9):12-15.
Analytics
Added to PP
2010-09-03
Downloads
49 (#446,201)
6 months
11 (#338,628)
2010-09-03
Downloads
49 (#446,201)
6 months
11 (#338,628)
Historical graph of downloads
Citations of this work
Real Virtuality: A Code of Ethical Conduct. Recommendations for Good Scientific Practice and the Consumers of VR-Technology.Michael Madary & Thomas Metzinger - 2016 - Frontiers in Robotics and AI 3:1-23.
Patient preference predictors and the problem of naked statistical evidence.Nathaniel Paul Sharadin - 2018 - Journal of Medical Ethics 44 (12):857-862.
Ownership of individual-level health data, data sharing, and data governance.Jan Piasecki & Phaik Yeong Cheah - 2022 - BMC Medical Ethics 23 (1):1-9.
Does Consent Bias Research?Mark A. Rothstein & Abigail B. Shoben - 2013 - American Journal of Bioethics 13 (4):27 - 37.
References found in this work
Principles of biomedical ethics.Tom L. Beauchamp - 1989 - New York: Oxford University Press. Edited by James F. Childress.
Patients' Views on Identifiability of Samples and Informed Consent for Genetic Research.Sara Chandros Hull, Richard Sharp, Jeffrey Botkin, Mark Brown, Mark Hughes, Jeremy Sugarman, Debra Schwinn, Pamela Sankar, Dragana Bolcic-Jankovic, Brian Clarridge & Benjamin Wilfond - 2008 - American Journal of Bioethics 8 (10):62-70.
Group risks, risks to groups, and group engagement in genetics research.Daniel M. Hausman - 2007 - Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 17 (4):351-369.
Biobanking: International Norms.Bartha Maria Knoppers - 2005 - Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 33 (1):7-14.
PhilPapers logo by Andrea Andrews and Meghan Driscoll.
This site uses cookies and Google Analytics (see our terms & conditions for details regarding the privacy implications). Use of this site is subject to terms & conditions.
All rights reserved by The PhilPapers Foundation
Server: philpapers-web-667477cd97-7qg25 dc2