A Parting of the Ways: Carnap, Cassirer, and Heidegger [Book Review]

Philosophical Review 111 (1):119 (2002)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The divide between the analytic and the continental philosophical traditions has been a major preoccupation of philosophers and historians of philosophy in the past few decades. Many attempts have been made to bridge the gap between the two traditions. Appel, Rorty, Cavell, and others, for example, have drawn to our attention profound affinities between Wittgenstein and Heidegger. But until now, it has nonetheless seemed that the divide remained firmly entrenched with respect to the thought of Heidegger and Carnap, between whom there still appears to be deep alienation. Heidegger and Carnap themselves encouraged this view. Carnap’s notorious attack on Heidegger left no possibility of dialogue between the two, and for Heidegger, the conflict with Carnap continued to be momentous even in the sixties. He described the conflict between himself and Carnap as embodying the “most extreme counterpositions” of the time.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive

    This entry is not archived by us. If you are the author and have permission from the publisher, we recommend that you archive it. Many publishers automatically grant permission to authors to archive pre-prints. By uploading a copy of your work, you will enable us to better index it, making it easier to find.

    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 106,169

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

A Parting of the Ways: Carnap, Cassirer, and Heidegger (review).Wybo Houkes - 2002 - Journal of the History of Philosophy 40 (4):554-555.

Analytics

Added to PP
2010-09-12

Downloads
126 (#183,015)

6 months
9 (#445,453)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Michael Roubach
Hebrew University of Jerusalem

Citations of this work

A ground completely overgrown: Heidegger, Kant and the problem of metaphysics.Karin de Boer & Stephen Howard - 2019 - British Journal for the History of Philosophy 27 (2):358-377.
Dedekind and Cassirer on Mathematical Concept Formation†.Audrey Yap - 2014 - Philosophia Mathematica 25 (3):369-389.
Kuhnianism and Neo-Kantianism: On Friedman’s Account of Scientific Change.Thodoris Dimitrakos - 2016 - International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 30 (4):361-382.

View all 18 citations / Add more citations

References found in this work

Pathmarks.Frederick A. Olafson - 2000 - Philosophical Review 109 (2):299-302.

Add more references