Popper’s Critical Rationalism: A Philosophical Investigation

New York: Routledge (2010)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

_Popper’s Critical Rationalism_ presents Popper’s views on science, knowledge, and inquiry, and examines the significance and tenability of these in light of recent developments in philosophy of science, philosophy of probability, and epistemology. It develops a fresh and novel philosophical position on science, which employs key insights from Popper while rejecting other elements of his philosophy. Central theses include: Crucial questions about scientific method arise at the level of the group, rather than that of the individual. Although criticism is vital for science, dogmatism is important too. Belief in scientific theories is permissible even in the absence of evidence in their favour. The aim of science is to eliminate false theories. Critical rationalism can be understood as a form of virtue epistemology.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 103,401

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Popper's Critical Rationalism: A Philosophical Investigation.Monica Aufrecht - 2012 - International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 26 (2):223-225.
Darrell P. Rowbottom Popper's Critical Rationalism: A Philosophical Investigation. [REVIEW]Donald Gillies - 2013 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 64 (1):229-232.
Rationalism Critical and Pancritical: What Did Popper and Bartley Disagree About?Dmytro Sepetyi - 2024 - Hopos: The Journal of the International Society for the History of Philosophy of Science 14 (2):572-602.

Analytics

Added to PP
2010-07-14

Downloads
398 (#75,599)

6 months
15 (#168,777)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Darrell P. Rowbottom
Lingnan University

Citations of this work

Scientific progress without increasing verisimilitude: In response to Niiniluoto.Darrell Patrick Rowbottom - 2015 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 51:100-104.
Evolutionary Epistemology and the Aim of Science.Darrell Patrick Rowbottom - 2010 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 88 (2):209-225.
What Scientific Progress Is Not: Against Bird’s Epistemic View.Darrell Patrick Rowbottom - 2010 - International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 24 (3):241-255.
Aimless science.Darrell Patrick Rowbottom - 2014 - Synthese 191 (6):1211-1221.

View all 31 citations / Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references