St. Thomas and the Definition of Active Potency

New Scholasticism 34 (4):431-437 (1960)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

ISBN(s)

00286621

DOI

10.5840/newscholas196034463

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 100,154

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

St. Thomas and the Definition of Active Potency.James E. Royce - 1960 - New Scholasticism 34 (4):431-437.
St. Anselm and St. Thomas.Edward L. Rousseau - 1980 - New Scholasticism 54 (1):1-24.
St. Albert and St. Thomas Aquinas.[author unknown] - 1943 - New Scholasticism 17 (1):87-92.
lmprudence in St. Thomas. [REVIEW]Gerald B. Phelan - 1956 - New Scholasticism 30 (4):512-514.
St. Thomas d’Aquin.Ignatius Smith - 1929 - New Scholasticism 3 (2):189-193.
Was St. Thomas a Philosopher?James F. Anderson - 1964 - New Scholasticism 38 (4):435-444.
St. Thomas and the Possibles.Lawrence Dewan - 1979 - New Scholasticism 53 (1):76-85.
The Silence of St. Thomas. [REVIEW]James Wieland - 1958 - New Scholasticism 32 (3):393-396.
The Teleology of St. Thomas.Edward A. Pace - 1927 - New Scholasticism 1 (3):213-231.

Analytics

Added to PP
2011-12-02

Downloads
25 (#868,970)

6 months
5 (#1,013,651)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Thomas Aquinas on hylomorphism and the in-act principle.Kendall A. Fisher - 2017 - British Journal for the History of Philosophy 25 (6):1053-1072.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references