- New
-
Topics
- All Categories
- Metaphysics and Epistemology
- Value Theory
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Logic and Philosophy of Logic
- Philosophy of Biology
- Philosophy of Cognitive Science
- Philosophy of Computing and Information
- Philosophy of Mathematics
- Philosophy of Physical Science
- Philosophy of Social Science
- Philosophy of Probability
- General Philosophy of Science
- Philosophy of Science, Misc
- History of Western Philosophy
- Philosophical Traditions
- Philosophy, Misc
- Other Academic Areas
- Journals
- Submit material
- More
The ‘New Governance Arrangements for Research Ethics Committees’: Policy-Shift and Equivocation on Matters of Illegal Research
Research Ethics 5 (4):160-161 (2009)
Abstract
This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)Other Versions
No versions found
My notes
Similar books and articles
The ethical review of student research in the context of the governance arrangements for research ethics committees.R. Ashcroft & M. Parker - 2003 - In Sue Eckstein (ed.), Manual for research ethics committees. New York: Cambridge University Press.
New governance arrangements for research ethics committees: is facilitating research achieved at the cost of participants' interest.E. Cave - 2002 - Journal of Medical Ethics 28 (5):318-321.
The Legal Research Committee: A Response to Roy-Toole.Colin Parker - 2009 - Research Ethics 5 (1):30-32.
What are local issues? The problem of the local review of research.P. Wainwright - 2004 - Journal of Medical Ethics 30 (3):313-317.
Ethics and research governance: the views of researchers, health-care professionals and other stakeholders.Nina Hallowell, Sarah Cooke, Gill Crawford, Michael Parker & Anneke Lucassen - 2008 - Clinical Ethics 3 (2):85-90.
Challenges for ethics committees in biomedical research governance: illustrations from China and Australia.Cao Huanhuan, Ming Li, Mingxu Wang, David Roder & Ian Norman Olver - 2021 - Journal of Medical Ethics and History of Medicine 14.
The Ad Hoc Advisory Group's proposals for research ethics committees: a mixture of the timid, the revolutionary, and the bizarre.A. J. Dawson - 2005 - Journal of Medical Ethics 31 (8):435-436.
Ethics Creep or Governance Creep?: Challenges for Australian Human Research Ethics Committees.Susanna M. Gorman - 2011 - Monash Bioethics Review 29 (4):23-38.
Ethical Review of Research on Human Subjects at Unilever: Reflections on Governance.Mark Sheehan, Vernon Marti & Tony Roberts - 2013 - Bioethics 28 (6):284-292.
Getting beyond form filling: The role of institutional governance in human research ethics. [REVIEW]Gary Allen - 2008 - Journal of Academic Ethics 6 (2):105-116.
Analytics
Added to PP
2014-01-21
Downloads
20 (#1,031,500)
6 months
4 (#1,240,197)
2014-01-21
Downloads
20 (#1,031,500)
6 months
4 (#1,240,197)
Historical graph of downloads
Citations of this work
Should research samples reflect the diversity of the population?P. Allmark - 2004 - Journal of Medical Ethics 30 (2):185-189.
References found in this work
Illegality in the Research Protocol: The Duty of Research Ethics Committees under the 2001 Clinical Trials Directive.Christopher Roy-Toole - 2008 - Research Ethics 4 (3):111-116.
Meeting the Needs of the Investigator and the REC Member.John Saunders - 2007 - Research Ethics 3 (4):111-112.
The Legal Research Committee: A Response to Roy-Toole.Colin Parker - 2009 - Research Ethics 5 (1):30-32.
Research Ethics Committees and the Legality of the Protocol: A Rejoinder and a Challenge to the Department of Health.Christopher Roy-Toole - 2009 - Research Ethics 5 (1):33-36.
PhilPapers logo by Andrea Andrews and Meghan Driscoll.
This site uses cookies and Google Analytics (see our terms & conditions for details regarding the privacy implications). Use of this site is subject to terms & conditions.
All rights reserved by The PhilPapers Foundation
Server: philpapers-web-667477cd97-lxkd2 dc2