Singular terms and arithmetical logicism

Philosophical Books 44 (3):193--219 (2003)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article is a critical notice of Bob Hale and Crispin Wright's *The Reason's Proper Study* (OUP). It focuses particularly on their attempts (crucial to their neo-logicist project) to say what a singular term is. I identify problems for their account but include some constructive suggestions about how it might be improved.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 101,174

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Analytics

Added to PP
2010-01-18

Downloads
109 (#196,145)

6 months
3 (#1,475,474)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Ian Rumfitt
Oxford University

Citations of this work

III-Reference by Abstraction.ØYstein Linnebo - 2012 - Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 112 (1pt1):45-71.
Abstractionism and Mathematical Singular Reference.Bahram Assadian - 2019 - Philosophia Mathematica 27 (2):177-198.
A general theory of abstraction operators.Neil Tennant - 2004 - Philosophical Quarterly 54 (214):105-133.
The Bearable Lightness of Being.Bob Hale - 2010 - Global Philosophy 20 (4):399-422.

View all 14 citations / Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references