The I in logic

Theoria (forthcoming)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This paper argues for the significance of Kaplan's logic LD in two ways: first, by looking at how logic got along before we had LD, and second, by using it to bring out the similarity between David Hume's thesis that one cannot deduce claims about the future on the basis of premises only about the past, and the so‐called "essentiality" of the indexical.

Categories

Add categories

Keywords

Reprint years

DOI

10.1111/theo.12543

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive

    This entry is not archived by us. If you are the author and have permission from the publisher, we recommend that you archive it. Many publishers automatically grant permission to authors to archive pre-prints. By uploading a copy of your work, you will enable us to better index it, making it easier to find.

    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 106,169

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

Lessons from the logic of demonstratives: what indexicality teaches us about logic and vice versa.G. Russell - 2012 - In Greg Restall & Gillian Kay Russell, New waves in philosophical logic. New York: Palgrave-Macmillan.
What is character?David Braun - 1995 - Journal of Philosophical Logic 24 (3):241--273.
Demonstratives in First-Order Logic.Geoff Georgi - 2020 - In Tadeusz Ciecierski & Pawel Grabarczyk, The Architecture of Context and Context-Sensitivity. Springer. pp. 125-148.
Logic for Languages Containing Referentially Promiscuous Expressions.Geoff Georgi - 2015 - Journal of Philosophical Logic 44 (4):429-451.
Barriers to Entailment: Hume's Law and other limits on logical consequence.Gillian K. Russell - 2023 - Oxford: Oxford University Press.
A Mystery of Grzegorczyk’s Logic of Descriptions.Joanna Golińska-Pilarek & Taneli Huuskonen - 2018 - In Urszula Wybraniec-Skardowska & Ángel Garrido, The Lvov-Warsaw School. Past and Present. Cham, Switzerland: Springer- Birkhauser,. pp. 731-745.
Doxastic Logic of Demonstratives; Indexical and Reflexive Pronouns in Ascriptions of Propositional Attitudes.Mika Oksanen - unknown
Cut‐Elimination Theorem for the Logic of Constant Domains.Ryo Kashima & Tatsuya Shimura - 1994 - Mathematical Logic Quarterly 40 (2):153-172.
Comments on 'Hume's Master Argument'.Charles Pigden - 2010 - In Hume on Is and Ought. New York: Palgrave-Macmillan. pp. 128-142.
Logic. of Descriptions. A New Approach to the Foundations of Mathematics and Science.Joanna Golińska-Pilarek & Taneli Huuskonen - 2012 - Studies in Logic, Grammar and Rhetoric 27 (40):63-94.

Analytics

Added to PP
2024-07-18

Downloads
45 (#549,249)

6 months
10 (#383,177)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Gillian Russell
Australian National University

Citations of this work

A Farewell to Fragility. [REVIEW]Lloyd Humberstone - 2024 - Australasian Journal of Logic 21 (5):210-282.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Naming and Necessity.Saul Kripke - 1980 - Philosophy 56 (217):431-433.
Past, present and future.Arthur N. Prior - 1967 - Oxford,: Clarendon P..
Attitudes de dicto and de se.David Lewis - 1979 - Philosophical Review 88 (4):513-543.
Demonstratives.David Kaplan - 1989 - In Joseph Almog, John Perry & Howard Wettstein, Themes From Kaplan. New York: Oxford University Press. pp. 481--563.

View all 20 references / Add more references