The Modal-Epistemic Argument: Wintein's Rebuttals Rebutted

Acta Philosophica (forthcoming)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

In a recent paper, Stefan Wintein criticizes my responses to the objections he raised to my modal-epistemic argument (MEA) for the existence of God. In this paper, I continue our debate and respond to Wintein’s criticisms of my previous responses. I argue that Wintein’s criticisms are unsuccessful. As a result, the MEA still stands.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Analytics

Added to PP
2024-05-06

Downloads
240 (#108,519)

6 months
144 (#31,674)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Emanuel Rutten
VU University Amsterdam

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

The modal-epistemic argument for the existence of God is flawed.Stefan Wintein - 2018 - International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 84 (3):307-322.

Add more references