- New
-
Topics
- All Categories
- Metaphysics and Epistemology
- Value Theory
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Logic and Philosophy of Logic
- Philosophy of Biology
- Philosophy of Cognitive Science
- Philosophy of Computing and Information
- Philosophy of Mathematics
- Philosophy of Physical Science
- Philosophy of Social Science
- Philosophy of Probability
- General Philosophy of Science
- Philosophy of Science, Misc
- History of Western Philosophy
- Philosophical Traditions
- Philosophy, Misc
- Other Academic Areas
- Journals
- Submit material
- More
Absolute versus relational space‐time: An outmoded debate
Journal of Philosophy 93 (6):279-306 (1996)
Abstract
This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)Author's Profile
Other Versions
No versions found
My notes
Similar books and articles
World enough and space‐time: Absolute versus relational theories of space and time.Robert Toretti & John Earman - 1989 - Philosophical Review 101 (3):723.
Absolute versus relational spacetime: For better or worse, the debate goes on.Carl Hoefer - 1998 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 49 (3):451-467.
World Enough and Space-Time: Absolute versus Relational Theories of Space and Time. John Earman. [REVIEW]M. L. G. Redhead - 1992 - Philosophy of Science 59 (4):718-722.
Review of John Earman: World Enough and Space-Time: Absolute Versus Relational Theories of Space and Time. [REVIEW]Anna Maidens - 1992 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 43 (1):129-136.
Review of John Earman: World Enough and Space-Time: Absolute Versus Relational Theories of Space and Time. [REVIEW]Carl Hoefer - 1992 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 43 (4):573-580.
World Enough and Space ‐ Time: Absolute versus Relational Theories of Space and Time.David Knight - 1991 - Philosophical Books 32 (3):188-188.
The Absolute Relations of Time and Space. [REVIEW]Theodore de Laguna - 1922 - Journal of Philosophy 19 (13):361-362.
John Earman, World Enough and Space-time: Absolute vs. relational theories of space and time Reviewed by.Carl Hoefer - 1991 - Philosophy in Review 11 (3):178-181.
Analytics
Added to PP
2009-01-28
Downloads
273 (#99,699)
6 months
13 (#272,256)
2009-01-28
Downloads
273 (#99,699)
6 months
13 (#272,256)
Historical graph of downloads
Author's Profile
Citations of this work
Substantivalist and Relationalist Approaches to Spacetime.Oliver Pooley - 2013 - In Robert Batterman (ed.), The Oxford Handbook of Philosophy of Physics. Oxford University Press USA.
Substantivalism, Relationism, and Structural Spacetime Realism.Mauro Dorato - 2000 - Foundations of Physics 30 (10):1605-1628.
Dark matter = modified gravity? Scrutinising the spacetime–matter distinction through the modified gravity/ dark matter lens.Niels C. M. Martens & Dennis Lehmkuhl - 2020 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B: Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics 72:237-250.
On the Ontology of Spacetime: Substantivalism, Relationism, Eternalism, and Emergence.Gustavo E. Romero - 2017 - Foundations of Science 22 (1):141-159.
Relationalism rehabilitated? I: Classical mechanics.Oliver Pooley & Harvey R. Brown - 2002 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 53 (2):183--204.
PhilPapers logo by Andrea Andrews and Meghan Driscoll.
This site uses cookies and Google Analytics (see our terms & conditions for details regarding the privacy implications). Use of this site is subject to terms & conditions.
All rights reserved by The PhilPapers Foundation
Server: philpapers-web-667477cd97-2pm92 dc2