Taking Reductionism to the Limit: How to Rebut the Antireductionist Argument from Infinite Limits

Philosophy of Science (3):455-482 (2017)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This paper analyses the anti-reductionist argument from renormalisation group explanations of universality, and shows how it can be rebutted if one assumes that the explanation in question is captured by the counterfactual dependence account of explanation.

Other Versions

No versions found

Analytics

Added to PP
2017-10-16

Downloads
818 (#27,770)

6 months
100 (#57,380)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author Profiles

Juha Saatsi
University of Leeds
Alexander Reutlinger
Ludwig Maximilians Universität, München

Citations of this work

Universality Reduced.Alexander Franklin - 2019 - Philosophy of Science 86 (5):1295-1306.
On the Universality of Hawking Radiation.Sean Gryb, Patricia Palacios & Karim Thebault - 2019 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science:axz025.
Universality caused: the case of renormalization group explanation.Emily Sullivan - 2019 - European Journal for Philosophy of Science 9 (3):36.

View all 8 citations / Add more citations

References found in this work

Four Decades of Scientific Explanation.Wesley C. Salmon & Anne Fagot-Largeault - 1989 - History and Philosophy of the Life Sciences 16 (2):355.
Minimal Model Explanations.Robert W. Batterman & Collin C. Rice - 2014 - Philosophy of Science 81 (3):349-376.
What Makes a Scientific Explanation Distinctively Mathematical?Marc Lange - 2013 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 64 (3):485-511.

View all 42 references / Add more references