Immigration Enforcement and Domination: An Indirect Argument for Much More Open Borders

Political Research Quarterly 1 (1):1-13 (2016)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Normative reflection on the ethics of migration has tended to remain at the level of abstract principle with limited attention to the practice of immigration administration and enforcement. This paper explores the implications of this practice for an ethics of immigration with particular attention to the problem of bureaucratic domination. I contend that migration administration and enforcement cannot overcome bureaucratic domination because of the inherent vulnerability of migrant populations and the transnational enforcement of border controls by multiple public and private actors. The implication is that even if restrictive immigration policies are permissible in principle, the attempt to enforce them leads to injustices that make them ethically unacceptable in practice.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 100,154

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2016-11-23

Downloads
42 (#524,997)

6 months
1 (#1,884,392)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Alex Sager
Portland State University

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references