Now that we know how low the reliability is, what shall we do?

Behavioral and Brain Sciences 14 (1):162-162 (1991)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 101,139

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

How directly do we know our minds?Maria Czyzewska & Pawel Lewicki - 1993 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 16 (1):37-38.
What we know about what we know.Shlomi Sher & Piotr Winkielman - 2014 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 37 (1):38-39.
How do we know when private events control behavior?Kurt Salzinger - 1993 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 16 (4):660-661.
What we know and the LTKB.Stanley Munsat - 1993 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 16 (3):466-467.
Why is the reliability of peer review so low?Donald Laming - 1991 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 14 (1):154-156.
What then should we do?Seth Roberts - 1984 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 7 (4):532-533.

Analytics

Added to PP
2014-01-20

Downloads
52 (#419,495)

6 months
7 (#715,360)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

The Structure of Scientific Revolutions.Thomas Samuel Kuhn - 1962 - Chicago: University of Chicago Press. Edited by Otto Neurath.
Criticism and the growth of knowledge.Imre Lakatos & Alan Musgrave (eds.) - 1970 - Cambridge [Eng.]: Cambridge University Press.
The sociology of science: theoretical and empirical investigations.Robert King Merton - 1973 - Chicago: University of Chicago Press. Edited by Norman W. Storer.

View all 44 references / Add more references