That F

Philosophical Studies 141 (2):263 - 280 (2008)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Jeffrey King's principal objection to the direct-reference theory of demonstratives is analyzed and criticized. King has responded with a modified version of his original argument aimed at establishing the weaker conclusion that the direct-reference theory of demonstratives is either incomplete or incorrect. It is argued that this fallback argument also fails

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

DOI

10.1007/s11098-008-9268-3

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

Persisting problems for a quantificational theory of complex demonstratives.David Braun - 2008 - Philosophical Studies 141 (2):243-262.
Complex demonstratives, singular thought, and belief attributions.José Manuel Viejo - 2022 - Synthese 200 (1):1-27.
Complex demonstratives, QI uses, and direct reference.Jeffrey C. King - 2008 - Philosophical Review 117 (1):99-117.
Salmon on the contingent a priori and the necessary a posteriori.Graham Oppy - 1994 - Philosophical Studies 73 (1):5 - 33.
On Sense and Direct Reference.Matthew Davidson (ed.) - 2007 - New York: McGraw-Hill.
Problems for a quantificational theory of complex demonstratives.David Braun - 2008 - Philosophical Studies 140 (3):335 - 358.
When that F is not F. Interpretability, Deixis and Complex Demonstratives.Joan Gimeno-Simó - 2022 - Epistemology and Philosophy of Science 59 (2):152-167.
Complex demonstratives qua singular terms.Eros Corazza - 2003 - Erkenntnis 59 (2):263 - 283.
Complex demonstratives and their singular contents.David Braun - 2008 - Linguistics and Philosophy 31 (1):57-99.
Demonstratives qua singular terms.Eros Corazza - 2003 - Erkenntnis 59 (2):263-283.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
265 (#100,945)

6 months
36 (#111,579)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Nathan Salmón
University of California, Santa Barbara

Citations of this work

Demonstratives without rigidity or ambiguity.Ethan Nowak - 2014 - Linguistics and Philosophy 37 (5):409-436.
Demonstratives in philosophy and linguistics.Lynsey Wolter - 2009 - Philosophy Compass 4 (3):451-468.
Salmon on Hob and Nob.David Friedell - 2013 - Philosophical Studies 165 (1):213-220.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Demonstratives: An Essay on the Semantics, Logic, Metaphysics and Epistemology of Demonstratives and other Indexicals.David Kaplan - 1989 - In Joseph Almog, John Perry & Howard Wettstein (eds.), Themes From Kaplan. New York: Oxford University Press. pp. 481-563.
Themes From Kaplan.Joseph Almog, John Perry & Howard Wettstein (eds.) - 1989 - New York: Oxford University Press.
Afterthoughts.David Kaplan - 1989 - In Joseph Almog, John Perry & Howard Wettstein (eds.), Themes From Kaplan. New York: Oxford University Press. pp. 565-614.
Intentional identity.P. T. Geach - 1967 - Journal of Philosophy 64 (20):627-632.

View all 15 references / Add more references