The Relationship Between Corporate Governance Mechanisms and Firm’s Performance Pre and Post-Malaysian Corporate Code Governance 2017: The Moderating Effect of Women Directors on Board

In Kıymet Tunca Çalıyurt (ed.), New Approaches to CSR, Sustainability and Accountability, Volume V. Springer Nature Singapore. pp. 165-199 (2024)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The composition of the board especially the inclusionInclusion of womenWomen directors on the board has attracted scholarly interest and public debate. The empirical evidence has failed to build a holistic case to support the womenWomen director’s influence on the world. In line with the revision of the Malaysian Code of Corporate GovernanceGovernance (MCCG) 2017, this study is carried out to ascertain the moderating effect of womenWomen directors’ participation on the relationship between corporate governanceGovernance mechanisms and firm performance before and after the revision. The components of corporate governanceGovernance mechanisms are; board independence, independence of auditAudit committee, director’s remuneration, risk management committee, and board meeting frequency. This study used Tobin’s Q as the proxy of firm performance. Companies listed on the main board of Bursa Malaysia were selected using a stratified random sampling method and relevant data were extracted from the annual report of selected companies for a period of the year 2015 and 2016 (before) and period of the year 2018 and 2019 (after) the revised code. Hierarchical regression analysis was used in over 200 selected public listed companies. The perspective of agency theory and resource-based view theory (RBVT) was applied to explain the relationship between corporate governanceGovernance mechanisms and firm financial performance. The findings suggest that womenWomen directors moderate the relationship between the independence of the auditAudit committee and firm performance before the MCCG 2017 revision. Meanwhile, the independence of the auditAudit committee and director’s remuneration was positively and significantly related to performance before the MCCG 2017 revision. After the MCCG 2017 revision, only the board meeting frequency was positively and significantly related to firm performance. It is important for the government and policymakers to review and revisit the MCCG 2017 and to reinforce the mandatory requirements of the code to be fully adopted by the public listed companies in Malaysia.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 101,518

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Director independence and performance of listed companies: evidence from Malaysia.Rashid Ameer, Anuar Nawawi & Fairuz Ramli - 2010 - International Journal of Business Governance and Ethics 5 (4):280-300.

Analytics

Added to PP
2024-03-13

Downloads
9 (#1,534,659)

6 months
7 (#749,523)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references