- New
-
Topics
- All Categories
- Metaphysics and Epistemology
- Value Theory
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Logic and Philosophy of Logic
- Philosophy of Biology
- Philosophy of Cognitive Science
- Philosophy of Computing and Information
- Philosophy of Mathematics
- Philosophy of Physical Science
- Philosophy of Social Science
- Philosophy of Probability
- General Philosophy of Science
- Philosophy of Science, Misc
- History of Western Philosophy
- Philosophical Traditions
- Philosophy, Misc
- Other Academic Areas
- Journals
- Submit material
- More
Perspectives on Achieving Institutional Trust in Personalized Medicine
American Journal of Bioethics 18 (4):39-41 (2018)
Abstract
This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)Other Versions
No versions found
My notes
Similar books and articles
Personalized Medicine in the NICU.Keith J. Barrington - 2013 - American Journal of Bioethics 13 (12):33-35.
The Patient Preference Predictor: A Timely Boost for Personalized Medicine.Nikola Biller-Andorno, Andrea Ferrario & Armin Biller - 2024 - American Journal of Bioethics 24 (7):35-38.
Big Decisions on a Small Scale: From Evidence-Based Medicine to Personalized Medicine.Liam G. McCoy, Stacy S. Chen, Connor T. A. Brenna & Sunit Das - 2022 - American Journal of Bioethics Neuroscience 13 (2):132-134.
Personalized Medicine in the Making: Philosophical Perspectives From Biology to Healthcare.Chiara Beneduce & Marta Bertolaso (eds.) - 2021 - Springer.
Personalized medicine, digital technology and trust: a Kantian account.Bjørn K. Myskja & Kristin S. Steinsbekk - 2020 - Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy 23 (4):577-587.
The American medical doctor in the current milieu: a matter of trust.Joseph P. Lyons - 1994 - Perspectives in Biology and Medicine 37 (3):442.
Ownership of Genetic Data: Between Universalism and Contextualism?Henri-Corto Stoeklé & Christian Hervé - 2021 - American Journal of Bioethics 21 (12):75-77.
Enhance Diversity Among Researchers to Promote Participant Trust in Precision Medicine Research.Demetrio Sierra-Mercado & Gabriel Lázaro-Muñoz - 2018 - American Journal of Bioethics 18 (4):44-46.
The Role of the Health Care Provider in Building Trust Between Patients and Precision Medicine Research Programs.Anitra Persaud & Vence L. Bonham - 2018 - American Journal of Bioethics 18 (4):26-28.
Addressing the Practical Implications of Intersectionality in Clinical Medicine: Ethical, Embodied and Institutional Dimensions.Claudia Barned, Corinne Lajoie & Eric Racine - 2019 - American Journal of Bioethics 19 (2):27-29.
Analytics
Added to PP
2018-04-06
Downloads
44 (#529,991)
6 months
5 (#702,808)
2018-04-06
Downloads
44 (#529,991)
6 months
5 (#702,808)
Historical graph of downloads
References found in this work
Beyond Consent: Building Trusting Relationships With Diverse Populations in Precision Medicine Research.Stephanie A. Kraft, Mildred K. Cho, Katherine Gillespie, Meghan Halley, Nina Varsava, Kelly E. Ormond, Harold S. Luft, Benjamin S. Wilfond & Sandra Soo-Jin Lee - 2018 - American Journal of Bioethics 18 (4):3-20.
Healthcare professionals’ and patients’ perspectives on consent to clinical genetic testing: moving towards a more relational approach.Samuel Gabrielle Natalie, Dheensa Sandi, Farsides Bobbie, Fenwick Angela & Lucassen Anneke - 2017 - BMC Medical Ethics 18 (1):47.
Cross-Cultural Interactions and Shared Decision-Making.Sabrina F. Derrington & Erin Paquette - 2021 - In John D. Lantos, The ethics of shared decision making. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
PhilPapers logo by Andrea Andrews and Meghan Driscoll.
This site uses cookies and Google Analytics (see our terms & conditions for details regarding the privacy implications). Use of this site is subject to terms & conditions.
All rights reserved by The PhilPapers Foundation
Server: philpapers-web-8567d8d854-wzn75 dc2