Contextualist Vs. Analytic History of Philosophy: A Study in Socrates

Think 8 (22):101-105 (2009)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

I here respond to James Warren and John Shand's replies to my paper ‘In Defence of Four Socratic Doctrines’ (all published in THINK 17) by questioning the supremacy of contextualist history of philosophy over the so-called ‘analytic’ approach.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 101,369

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Replies to Critics.Nuno Venturinha - 2020 - Logos and Episteme 11 (4):527-542.
What Has History of Science to Do with History of Philosophy?Tad M. Schmaltz - 2013 - In Mogens Laerke, Justin E. H. Smith & Eric Schliesser (eds.), Philosophy and Its History: Aims and Methods in the Study of Early Modern Philosophy. New York, US: Oxford University Press USA.
Inferentialist Philosophy of Language and the Historiography of Philosophy.Kevin J. Harrelson - 2014 - British Journal for the History of Philosophy 22 (3):582-603.
Replies to my critics.Robert Sinclair - 2023 - Asian Journal of Philosophy 2 (2):1-13.
Simple Contextualism about Epistemic Modals Is Incorrect.Benjamin Lennertz - 2014 - Thought: A Journal of Philosophy 3 (4):252-262.

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-11-01

Downloads
174 (#137,380)

6 months
14 (#237,383)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Constantine Sandis
University of Hertfordshire

Citations of this work

Hegel on Purpose.Arto Laitinen & Constantine Sandis - 2019 - Hegel Bulletin 40 (3):444-463.

Add more citations

References found in this work

On saying no to history of philosophy.Tom Sorell - 2005 - In Tom Sorell & Graham Alan John Rogers (eds.), Analytic philosophy and history of philosophy. New York: Oxford University Press.
On defending Socrates.James Warren - 2008 - Think 6 (17-18):99-101.

Add more references