Disappearing Diamonds: Fitch-Like Results in Bimodal Logic

Journal of Philosophical Logic 48 (6):1003-1016 (2019)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Augment the propositional language with two modal operators: □ and ■. Define ⧫ to be the dual of ■, i.e. ⧫=¬■¬. Whenever (X) is of the form φ → ψ, let (X⧫) be φ→⧫ψ . (X⧫) can be thought of as the modally qualified counterpart of (X)—for instance, under the metaphysical interpretation of ⧫, where (X) says φ implies ψ, (X⧫) says φ implies possibly ψ. This paper shows that for various interesting instances of (X), fairly weak assumptions suffice for (X⧫) to imply (X)—so, the modally qualified principle is as strong as its unqualified counterpart. These results have surprising and interesting implications for issues spanning many areas of philosophy.

Other Versions

No versions found

Similar books and articles

Analytics

Added to PP
2019-02-09

Downloads
1,177 (#15,433)

6 months
113 (#47,533)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Weng Kin San
New York University

Citations of this work

KK, Knowledge, Knowability.Weng Kin San - 2023 - Mind 132 (527):605-630.
Fitch's Paradox and Level-Bridging Principles.Weng Kin San - 2020 - Journal of Philosophy 117 (1):5-29.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Modal Logic: An Introduction.Brian F. Chellas - 1980 - New York: Cambridge University Press.
A logical analysis of some value concepts.Frederic Fitch - 1963 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 28 (2):135-142.
The Logic of What Might Have Been.Nathan Salmon - 1989 - Philosophical Review 98 (1):3-34.
Ceteris Paribus Conditionals and Comparative Normalcy.Martin Smith - 2006 - Journal of Philosophical Logic 36 (1):97-121.

View all 11 references / Add more references