On Reading Part IV of Personal Knowledge

Tradition and Discovery 30 (1):24-34 (2003)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

In this paper I argue that there are good reasons for not reading the last part of Polanyi’s book Personal Knowledge (1958) as the outline of a finalistic metaphysics, as proposed recently by Haught and Yeager, but rather as a modest speculative attempt to fulfill the requirements of a Gifford Lecturer, namely to treat of the relation between God and the world. Apart from the background of the writing of the book, I suggest that the predicament of theism in the contemporary antimetaphysical climate and Polanyi’s emphasis onreligious practice, rather than metaphysical theorizing, as the locus of meaning in his other writings on religion, support this reading as well.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 101,369

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Marjorie Grene and Personal Knowledge.Phil Mullins - 2010 - Tradition and Discovery 37 (2):20-44.
The Personal and the Subjective.Marjorie Grene - 1995 - Tradition and Discovery 22 (3):6-16.
Polanyi's Au gustinianism.John V. Apczynski - 1993 - Tradition and Discovery 20 (1):27-41.
“Personal Knowledge At Fifty” Conference Program.Richard Gelwick - 2007 - Tradition and Discovery 34 (3):18-30.
Polanyi's presagement of the incommensurability concept.Struan Jacobs - 2002 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 33 (1):101-116.
Rules of Rightness.Michael Polanyi - 2023 - Tradition and Discovery 49 (1):4-13.

Analytics

Added to PP
2012-03-18

Downloads
125 (#175,123)

6 months
6 (#879,768)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references