The problem of rational theory-choice

Epistemologia 18 (2):299-312 (1995)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The problem of rational theory-choice is the problem of whether choice of theory by a scientist may be objectively rational in the absence of an invariant scientific method. In this paper I offer a solution to the problem, but the solution I propose may come as something of a surprise. For I wish to argue that the work of the very authors who have put the rationality of such choice in question, Thomas Kuhn and Paul Feyerabend, contains all that is needed to solve the problem.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Rationality and epistemic paradox.Frederick Kroon - 1993 - Synthese 94 (3):377 - 408.
Epistemic Transformation and Rational Choice.Krister Bykvist & H. Orri Stefánsson - 2017 - Economics and Philosophy 33 (1):125-138.
Arrow’s theorem and theory choice.Davide Rizza - 2014 - Synthese 191 (8):1847-1856.
The Evolution of Distributive Justice.Jason Mckenzie Alexander - 2000 - Dissertation, University of California, Irvine
Bounded rationality in social sciences.Juan Fco Álvarez & Javier Echeverría - 2008 - Poznan Studies in the Philosophy of the Sciences and the Humanities 96 (1):173-189.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
1,505 (#10,457)

6 months
158 (#26,220)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Howard Sankey
University of Melbourne

References found in this work

Normal science and its dangers.Karl Popper - 1970 - In Imre Lakatos & Alan Musgrave (eds.), Criticism and the growth of knowledge. Cambridge [Eng.]: Cambridge University Press. pp. 51--8.
Chalmers on method.Barry Gower - 1988 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 39 (1):59-65.

Add more references