- New
-
Topics
- All Categories
- Metaphysics and Epistemology
- Value Theory
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Logic and Philosophy of Logic
- Philosophy of Biology
- Philosophy of Cognitive Science
- Philosophy of Computing and Information
- Philosophy of Mathematics
- Philosophy of Physical Science
- Philosophy of Social Science
- Philosophy of Probability
- General Philosophy of Science
- Philosophy of Science, Misc
- History of Western Philosophy
- Philosophical Traditions
- Philosophy, Misc
- Other Academic Areas
- Journals
- Submit material
- More
We should not manipulate the genome of domestic hogs
Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 4 (2):177-185 (1991)
Abstract
This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)Other Versions
No versions found
My notes
Similar books and articles
It is morally permissible to manipulate the genome of domestic hogs.Charles Blatz - 1991 - Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 4 (2):166-176.
Review of Steve F. Sapontzis: Morals, reason, and animals. [REVIEW]R. G. Frey - 1989 - Ethics 100 (1):191-192.
Review of: Steve F. Sapontzis (ed.), Food for Thought: The Debate over Eating Meat. [REVIEW]Michael Allen Fox - 2006 - Environmental Values 15 (2):264.
Steve F. Sapontzis, Morals, Reason, and Animals. [REVIEW]Frank De Roose - 1988 - Philosophy in Review 8:110-113.
Steve F. Sapontzis, Morals, Reason, and Animals Reviewed by.Frank De Roose - 1988 - Philosophy in Review 8 (3):110-113.
Book Review:Morals, Reasons, and Animals. S. F. Sapontzis. [REVIEW]R. G. Frey - 1989 - Ethics 100 (1):191-.
Using risk assessment to define domestic animal welfare.Gary P. Moberg - forthcoming - Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics.
Analytics
Added to PP
2009-01-28
Downloads
42 (#538,217)
6 months
5 (#1,071,419)
2009-01-28
Downloads
42 (#538,217)
6 months
5 (#1,071,419)
Historical graph of downloads
Citations of this work
Animal Disenhancement and the Non-Identity Problem: A Response to Thompson.Clare Palmer - 2011 - NanoEthics 5 (1):43-48.
Ethics and the genetic engineering of food animals.Paul B. Thompson - 1997 - Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 10 (1):1-23.
The opposite of human enhancement: Nanotechnology and the blind chicken problem. [REVIEW]Paul B. Thompson - 2008 - NanoEthics 2 (3):305-316.
References found in this work
PhilPapers logo by Andrea Andrews and Meghan Driscoll.
This site uses cookies and Google Analytics (see our terms & conditions for details regarding the privacy implications). Use of this site is subject to terms & conditions.
All rights reserved by The PhilPapers Foundation
Server: philpapers-web-667477cd97-lv8mh dc2