A Bergsonian Account of Action as a Basis for Understanding Moral Responsibility

Dissertation, Vanderbilt University (1983)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The object of this dissertation is to discover a ground for our common-sense view that a person is morally responsible for her actions. I begin with the assumption that if we are justified in holding an agent morally responsible, it must be possible for her to do better or worse than she does. Using Bergson's concept of duration as the model for how conscious experience develops, I construct a schema for how actions happen that shows how it is possible for the agent to act otherwise than she does. I adopt Bergson's approach to understanding persons and their relationship to their actions because it accounts for the durational/mental aspect of the human being as well as the spatial/physical aspect. We can better understand how the person produces an action if we think of her not only as a living body with repeating life processes but also as an ongoing mental process. ;Bergson's approach can help us to understand and support theories of agent-causation. I have focused on Chisholm's concept of agent-causation and the difficulty in explaining how immanent causation happens. In Bergson's schema, making events happen is an integral part of the process of conscious experience that the human being is. As a physical body a person undergoes events; however, as a process of conscious experience, that same person becomes aware of those events in the context of her experience and can evaluate them in order to envision and implement a new approach to her situation. When the person operates in this creative mode, viewing her situation from what Bergson calls the natural standpoint, she immanently causes her own action. ;For morality, the important choice the agent makes is whether or not to assume the natural standpoint as the point of departure for her efforts. The agent can take the most credit for an action that she has developed herself. Such an action fully engages the agent's knowledge and abilities, and so best represents the person that the agent becomes through completing the action. Even in allowing habit to direct her efforts, however, the agent is minimally responsible for her action insofar as she could have chosen to bypass those directions and to act creatively

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive

    This entry is not archived by us. If you are the author and have permission from the publisher, we recommend that you archive it. Many publishers automatically grant permission to authors to archive pre-prints. By uploading a copy of your work, you will enable us to better index it, making it easier to find.

    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 105,586

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

How to be morally responsible for another's free intentional action.Olle Blomberg - 2023 - Journal of Ethics and Social Philosophy 25 (3):545-579.
Liberating Constraints.Ishtiyaque Haji - 1997 - Journal of Philosophical Research 22:261-287.
Liberating Constraints.Ishtiyaque Haji - 1997 - Journal of Philosophical Research 22:261-287.
Inference as a Mental Act.David Hunter - 2009 - In Lucy O'Brien & Matthew Soteriou, Mental actions. New York: Oxford University Press.
Coercion and Moral Blameworthiness.Lloyd Fields - 2001 - International Journal of Applied Philosophy 15 (1):135-151.
Agency as Responsibility.Scott Shushan - 2017 - Dissertation, New School for Social Research

Analytics

Added to PP
2015-02-06

Downloads
0

6 months
0

Historical graph of downloads

Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references