- New
-
Topics
- All Categories
- Metaphysics and Epistemology
- Value Theory
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Logic and Philosophy of Logic
- Philosophy of Biology
- Philosophy of Cognitive Science
- Philosophy of Computing and Information
- Philosophy of Mathematics
- Philosophy of Physical Science
- Philosophy of Social Science
- Philosophy of Probability
- General Philosophy of Science
- Philosophy of Science, Misc
- History of Western Philosophy
- Philosophical Traditions
- Philosophy, Misc
- Other Academic Areas
- Journals
- Submit material
- More
Punishment is Organized around Principles of Communicative Inference
Cognition 208 (C):104544 (2021)
Abstract
This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)Author's Profile
Other Versions
No versions found
My notes
Similar books and articles
Alfred R. Mele and fiery Cushman.Folk Judgments - 2007 - In Peter A. French & Howard K. Wettstein (eds.), Philosophy and the Empirical. Blackwell. pp. 31--184.
From Retributive to Restorative Justice.Erin I. Kelly - 2021 - Criminal Law and Philosophy 15 (2):237-247.
Ralston, D. Christopher, and Justin Ho (eds): Philosophical reflections on disability. [REVIEW]Jason D. Whitt - 2013 - Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 34 (5):441-446.
Book Review: D. Christopher Ralston; Justin Ho (Eds.): Philosophical Reflections on Disability. [REVIEW]Franziska Felder - 2011 - .
Book Review:History of Ancient Philosophy. W. Windelband, Herbert Ernest Cushman. [REVIEW]Charles M. Bakewell - 1900 - International Journal of Ethics 10 (3):407-.
Communicative retribution as a constructivist theory of punishment - penal pain as a communicative artifact?Carlos Gómez-Jara - unknown
Review of W. Windelband and Herbert Ernest Cushman: History of Ancient Philosophy. [REVIEW]Charles M. Bakewell - 1900 - International Journal of Ethics 10 (3):407-410.
The communicative theory of punishment and the problem of dangerous offenders.Daisy Seabourne - 2018 - Dissertation, Cardiff University
Jonathan Edwards: the Fiery Puritan. By W. Riley. [REVIEW]H. B. Parks - 1930 - International Journal of Ethics 41:391.
Analytics
Added to PP
2020-12-29
Downloads
28 (#775,195)
6 months
8 (#533,737)
2020-12-29
Downloads
28 (#775,195)
6 months
8 (#533,737)
Historical graph of downloads
Author's Profile
Citations of this work
A pluralistic framework for the psychology of norms.Evan Westra & Kristin Andrews - 2022 - Biology and Philosophy 37 (5):1-30.
Moral dynamics: Grounding moral judgment in intuitive physics and intuitive psychology.Felix A. Sosa, Tomer Ullman, Joshua B. Tenenbaum, Samuel J. Gershman & Tobias Gerstenberg - 2021 - Cognition 217 (C):104890.
Modelling Perjury: Between Trust and Blame.Izabela Skoczeń - 2021 - International Journal for the Semiotics of Law - Revue Internationale de Sémiotique Juridique 35 (2):771-805.
Consequentialist Motives for Punishment Signal Trustworthiness.Nathan A. Dhaliwal, Daniel P. Skarlicki, JoAndrea Hoegg & Michael A. Daniels - 2020 - Journal of Business Ethics 176 (3):451-466.
Memory and Counterfactual Simulations for Past Wrongdoings Foster Moral Learning and Improvement.Matthew L. Stanley, Roberto Cabeza, Rachel Smallman & Felipe De Brigard - 2021 - Cognitive Science 45 (6):e13007.
References found in this work
The moral education theory of punishment.Jean Hampton - 1984 - Philosophy and Public Affairs 13 (3):208-238.
Action understanding as inverse planning.Chris L. Baker, Rebecca Saxe & Joshua B. Tenenbaum - 2009 - Cognition 113 (3):329-349.
Knowledge and Implicature: Modeling Language Understanding as Social Cognition.Noah D. Goodman & Andreas Stuhlmüller - 2013 - Topics in Cognitive Science 5 (1):173-184.
PhilPapers logo by Andrea Andrews and Meghan Driscoll.
This site uses cookies and Google Analytics (see our terms & conditions for details regarding the privacy implications). Use of this site is subject to terms & conditions.
All rights reserved by The PhilPapers Foundation
Server: philpapers-web-667477cd97-wmc4m dc2