Why genetic testing for genes for criminality is morally required

Princeton Journal of Bioethics 4:79-97 (2000)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 101,139

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

A Not‐So‐New Eugenics.Robert Sparrow - 2011 - Hastings Center Report 41 (1):32-42.
Procreative Beneficence and Genetic Enhancement.Walter Veit - 2018 - Kriterion - Journal of Philosophy 32 (1):75-92.

Analytics

Added to PP
2014-03-20

Downloads
30 (#753,100)

6 months
8 (#591,777)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Julian Savulescu
Oxford University

Citations of this work

In defence of Procreative Beneficence.J. Savulescu - 2007 - Journal of Medical Ethics 33 (5):284-288.
Reproductive Choice, Enhancement, and the Moral Continuum Argument.E. Malmqvist - 2014 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 39 (1):41-54.
The return of the Inseminator: Eutelegenesis in past and contemporary reproductive ethics.John Mcmillan - 2005 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C: Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences 38 (2):393-410.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references