True Propositions: A Reply to C.J.F. Williams

Analysis 32 (3):101-106 (1972)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This paper replies to points Williams makes to his reply to Sayward’s criticism of Williams’s proposal of ‘for some p ___ states that p & p’ as an analysis of ‘___ is true’.

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

DOI

10.1093/analys/32.3.101

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 101,270

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

Williams’ Definition of ‘X is true’.Charles Sayward - 1970 - Analysis 30 (3):95-97.
On Truth: A Reply to C. J. F. Williams.O. R. Jones - 1970 - Analysis 31 (1):24.
On Truth-A Reply To C J F Williams.O. R. Jones - 1970 - Analysis 31 (October):24-29.
Cambridge Properties and Defunct Individuals: A Reply to C. J. F. Williams.Barry Miller - 1983 - Analysis 43 (1):17 - 19.
Problems in the Theory of Knowledge. [REVIEW]G. H. B. - 1973 - Review of Metaphysics 26 (4):771-772.
Williams on Kaplan on the contingent analytic.Graham Oppy - 1995 - Ratio 8 (2):189-192.
A Peircean examination of Gettier’s two cases.Richard Kenneth Atkins - 2021 - Synthese 199 (5-6):12945-12961.
Truth and Truthmakers.Walter Schultz - 2015 - Philosophia Christi 17 (1):7-30.
Comparatives and Degrees.Adam Morton - 1984 - Analysis 44 (1):16 - 20.
Sayward on assertion and belief.Robert A. Imlay - 1968 - Philosophical Studies 19 (5):76 - 79.

Analytics

Added to PP
2011-02-21

Downloads
218 (#117,963)

6 months
17 (#177,229)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Charles Sayward
University of Nebraska, Lincoln

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references