Mencius and Xunzi on Human Nature: the Concept of Moral Autonomy in the early Confucian Tradition

Abstract

The doctrines on the goodness or evilness of human nature maintained in ancient China respectively by Mencius and Xunzi has been interpreted mosttly as a contradition within the Confucian school. In this article it is argued that they represent two distinct , yet possible and congruous, modes of interpreting and re-elaboarting Confucius teachings, two opposing yet largerly complementary currents which have developed within the Confucian school

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 101,139

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

  • Only published works are available at libraries.

Similar books and articles

The debate on human nature in early confucian literature.Maurizio Scarpari - 2003 - Philosophy East and West 53 (3):323-339.
Two Visions of Confucianism: Mencius and Xunzi.Siufu Tang - 2023 - In Yang Xiao & Kim-Chong Chong (eds.), Dao Companion to the Philosophy of Mencius. Springer. pp. 99-118.
Xunzi: The Complete Text.H. G. Xunzi - 2014 - Princeton: Princeton University Press. Edited by Eric L. Hutton.
Xunzi: The Complete Text.Eric L. Hutton - 2014 - Princeton: Princeton University Press. Edited by Eric L. Hutton.
On Liu Zong-yuan's View on Mencius.Yong Zhang - 2011 - Philosophy and Culture 38 (6):63-76.
On Mencius' Aesthetic Theory of Human Character.Xin Liu - 1997 - Philosophy and Culture 24 (9):882-889.

Analytics

Added to PP
2015-01-30

Downloads
4 (#1,804,354)

6 months
4 (#1,252,858)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references