Believing Well

In Conor McHugh, Jonathan Way & Daniel Whiting (eds.), Metaepistemology. Oxford: Oxford University Press. pp. 196-212 (2018)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Categories

Add categories

Keywords

Reprint years

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

Valuing Knowledge: A Deontological Approach.Christian Piller - 2009 - Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 12 (4):413-428.
Comments on Mark Schroeder, Being For. [REVIEW]Seth Yalcin - 2012 - Central APA.
Mark Schroeder, Noncognitivism in Ethics. [REVIEW]Daniel R. Boisvert - 2013 - Journal of Moral Philosophy 10 (2):234-236.
Review of mark Schroeder, Slaves of the Passions. [REVIEW]David Sobel - 2009 - Notre Dame Philosophical Reviews 2009 (4).
Slaves of the Passions (Mark Schroeder).Oxford: Oxford University Press. [REVIEW]Bradford Cokelet - 2009 - Ethics 119 (2):386-389.
Being For: Evaluating the Semantic Program of Expressivism – Mark Schroeder. [REVIEW]John Eriksson - 2010 - Philosophical Quarterly 60 (241):878-882.
Review: Mark Schroeder, Explaining the Reasons We Share: Explanation and Expression in Ethics. [REVIEW]Review by: John Brunero - 2015 - Ethics 126 (1):238-244.
Correction to: Regrettable beliefs.Mica Rapstine - 2020 - Philosophical Studies 178 (8):2701-2701.
Review: Mark Schroeder, Explaining the Reasons We Share: Explanation and Expression in Ethics. [REVIEW]John Brunero - 2015 - Ethics 126 (1):238-244.
Book Review: Reasons First (By Mark Schroeder). [REVIEW]Theptawee Chokvasin - 2021 - Suranaree Journal of Social Science 15:136-138.

Analytics

Added to PP
2024-06-12

Downloads
87 (#242,417)

6 months
51 (#100,238)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Mark Schroeder
University of Southern California

Citations of this work

The fundamental reason for reasons fundamentalism.Mark Schroeder - 2021 - Philosophical Studies 178 (10):3107-3127.
A puzzle about enkratic reasoning.Jonathan Way - 2020 - Philosophical Studies 178 (10):3177-3196.
The knowledge norm of assertion: keep it simple.Max Lewis - 2021 - Synthese 199 (5-6):12963-12984.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references