Certainty is not a morally defensible threshold to determine eligibility for assisted dying

Bioethics 33 (2):219-220 (2019)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 101,010

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Reply to Udo schuklenk.Mairi Levitt & Hub Zwart - 2010 - Journal of Bioethical Inquiry 7 (1):89-90.
MAID’s slippery slope: a commentary on Downie and Schuklenk.Tom Koch - 2021 - Journal of Medical Ethics 47 (10):670-671.
Physician-assisted dying: thoughts drawn from Albert Camus’ writing.Claudia Bozzaro - 2018 - Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 39 (2):111-122.
Five words for assisted dying.Iain Brassington - 2008 - Law and Philosophy 27 (5):415 - 444.

Analytics

Added to PP
2019-01-30

Downloads
28 (#799,564)

6 months
3 (#1,470,638)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Udo Schüklenk
Queen's University

Citations of this work

Questioning the Ethics of Assisted Dying for the Mentally Ill.Patrick Craine - 2023 - Canadian Journal of Bioethics / Revue canadienne de bioéthique 6 (3-4):115-127.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references