DRT with local contexts

Natural Language Semantics 19 (4):373-392 (2011)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

In this note, we reconstruct some results of the DRT analysis of presupposition projection within the theory of local contexts of Schlenker (2009). The latter offered a way to annotate every sentence with variables that denote the various local context sets that play a crucial role in Heim’s satisfaction theory (Heim 1983). In standard satisfaction theories, a presupposition must be entailed by its local context. Here we allow a presupposition to be indexed with other local contexts, and we propose, following van der Sandt (1992) and Zeevat (1992), that presuppositions are preferably anaphoric to the highest possible context. The resulting analysis emulates some desirable results of DRT—notably its solution to the ‘Proviso Problem’ (Geurts 1999). But it arguably improves on DRT in some respects: it can generate genuine conditional presuppositions; and it yields more adequate results for some quantified examples. Several limitations of the theory—some of them quite severe—are also discussed

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive

    This entry is not archived by us. If you are the author and have permission from the publisher, we recommend that you archive it. Many publishers automatically grant permission to authors to archive pre-prints. By uploading a copy of your work, you will enable us to better index it, making it easier to find.

    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 106,169

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Erratum to: DRT with local contexts. [REVIEW]Philippe Schlenker - 2011 - Natural Language Semantics 19 (4):393-393.
The Proviso Problem: a note. [REVIEW]Philippe Schlenker - 2011 - Natural Language Semantics 19 (4):395-422.
Local contexts and local meanings.Philippe Schlenker - 2010 - Philosophical Studies 151 (1):115-142.
Presuppositions and pronouns.Bart Geurts - 1999 - New York: Elsevier.
Subclausal Local Contexts.Kyle H. Blumberg & Amir Anvari - 2021 - Journal of Semantics 38 (3):393-414.
Maximize Presupposition! and local contexts.Raj Singh - 2011 - Natural Language Semantics 19 (2):149-168.
Gesture projection and cosuppositions.Philippe Schlenker - 2018 - Linguistics and Philosophy 41 (3):295-365.
Dissatisfaction Theory.Matthew Mandelkern - forthcoming - Semantics and Linguistic Theory 26:391-416.

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-12-01

Downloads
123 (#186,810)

6 months
11 (#332,542)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Philippe Schlenker
Institut Jean Nicod

Citations of this work

Attitudes, Presuppositions, and the Binding Theory.Kyle Blumberg - 2023 - Journal of Semantics 40 (2-3):265-288.
The dynamics of negative concord.Jeremy Kuhn - 2021 - Linguistics and Philosophy 45 (1):153-198.
On denying presuppositions.Lenny Clapp - 2017 - Synthese 194 (6).
The Proviso Problem: a note. [REVIEW]Philippe Schlenker - 2011 - Natural Language Semantics 19 (4):395-422.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Demonstratives: An Essay on the Semantics, Logic, Metaphysics and Epistemology of Demonstratives and other Indexicals.David Kaplan - 1989 - In Joseph Almog, John Perry & Howard Wettstein, Themes From Kaplan. New York: Oxford University Press. pp. 481-563.
A Theory of Truth and Semantic Representation.Hans Kamp - 2002 - In Paul H. Portner & Barbara H. Partee, Formal Semantics - the Essential Readings. Blackwell. pp. 189--222.
Presuppositions and pronouns.Bart Geurts - 1999 - New York: Elsevier.
On the Projection Problem for Presuppositions.Irene Heim - 2002 - In Paul H. Portner & Barbara H. Partee, Formal Semantics - the Essential Readings. Blackwell. pp. 249--260.

View all 7 references / Add more references