- New
-
Topics
- All Categories
- Metaphysics and Epistemology
- Value Theory
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Logic and Philosophy of Logic
- Philosophy of Biology
- Philosophy of Cognitive Science
- Philosophy of Computing and Information
- Philosophy of Mathematics
- Philosophy of Physical Science
- Philosophy of Social Science
- Philosophy of Probability
- General Philosophy of Science
- Philosophy of Science, Misc
- History of Western Philosophy
- Philosophical Traditions
- Philosophy, Misc
- Other Academic Areas
- Journals
- Submit material
- More
Extrapolation from Animal Models
In Peter McLaughlin, Peter Machamer & Rick Grush (eds.), Theory and Method in the Neurosciences. Pittsburgh University Press. pp. 200 (2001)
Abstract
This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)Author's Profile
Other Versions
No versions found
Links
PhilArchive
External links
(no proxy)
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Through your library
- Sign in / register and customize your OpenURL resolver
- Configure custom resolver
My notes
Similar books and articles
Models and mechanisms: On the methodology of animal extrapolation.Daniel Steel & Megan Delehanty - manuscript
Nineteenth-Century Aether Theories by Kenneth F. Schaffner. [REVIEW]Loyd Swenson Jr - 1973 - Isis 64:275-276.
Review of Discovery and Explanation in Biology and Medicine by Kenneth F. Schaffner. [REVIEW]Fred Gifford - 1996 - Philosophy of Science 63 (1):147-148.
Review of Kenneth F. Schaffner: Discovery and explanation in biology and medicine. [REVIEW]John Worrall - 1995 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 46 (4):621-623.
Kenneth F. Schaffner. Behaving: What’s Genetic, What’s Not, and Why Should We Care?James Tabery - 2018 - Philosophy of Science 85 (2):321-324.
Genetics, behavior, and lessons from C. elegans: Kenneth F. Schaffner: Behaving: What’s genetic, what’s not, and why should we care? New York: Oxford University Press, 2016, 304pp, $74.00.Amy Coffin - 2017 - Metascience 26 (2):281-283.
Bacteriophage biology and Kenneth Schaffner's rendition of developmentalism.Gregory J. Morgan - 2001 - Biology and Philosophy 16 (1):85-92.
The explanatory power and limits of simulation models in the neurosciences.H. Cruse - 2001 - In Peter McLaughlin, Peter Machamer & Rick Grush (eds.), Theory and Method in the Neurosciences. Pittsburgh University Press. pp. 138--154.
Validating Animal Models.Nina A. Atanasova - 2015 - Theoria: Revista de Teoría, Historia y Fundamentos de la Ciencia 30 (2):163.
Extrapolating from Laboratory Behavioral Research on Nonhuman Primates Is Unjustified.Parker Crutchfield - 2020 - Journal of Applied Philosophy 37 (4):628-645.
Analytics
Added to PP
2014-02-01
Downloads
53 (#407,693)
6 months
4 (#1,246,434)
2014-02-01
Downloads
53 (#407,693)
6 months
4 (#1,246,434)
Historical graph of downloads
Author's Profile
Citations of this work
The ‘Big Picture’: The Problem of Extrapolation in Basic Research.Tudor M. Baetu - 2016 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 67 (4):941-964.
Extrapolation, Analogy, and Comparative Process Tracing.Francesco Guala - 2010 - Philosophy of Science 77 (5):1070-1082.
Trust in Science: CRISPR–Cas9 and the Ban on Human Germline Editing.Stephan Guttinger - 2018 - Science and Engineering Ethics 24 (4):1077-1096.
From humanized mice to human disease: guiding extrapolation from model to target.Monika Piotrowska - 2013 - Biology and Philosophy 28 (3):439-455.
Experimentation in Cognitive Neuroscience and Cognitive Neurobiology.Jacqueline Anne Sullivan - 2014 - In Levy Neil & Clausen Jens (eds.), Handbook on Neuroethics. Springer.
PhilPapers logo by Andrea Andrews and Meghan Driscoll.
This site uses cookies and Google Analytics (see our terms & conditions for details regarding the privacy implications). Use of this site is subject to terms & conditions.
All rights reserved by The PhilPapers Foundation
Server: philpapers-web-667477cd97-2pm92 dc2