From braniss to Dilthey: Increase of knowledge and loss of orientation in the passage from the speculative philosophy of history to the philosophy of empirical sciences

Archivio di Storia Della Cultura 24 (2011)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article describes the different positions of Dilthey and Braniß in respect to the significance and the task of philosophy and history within the shaping of the paradigms of thought and the orientation criteria of modernity. The scientific nature of the disciplines and that of progress represents a point of reference for facing the historicity of logic, the relationship between history and philosophy and the relationship between history and religion. In this perspective, Braniß’s approach emerges as a metaphysical one while Dilthey’s approach intends the foundation of empirical knowledge in the realm of the humanities and scienties

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 101,010

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Dilthey on the unity of science.Nabeel Hamid - 2016 - British Journal for the History of Philosophy 24 (4):635-656.
Civil philosophy and the crisis of modernity.Riccardo Di Donato - 2007 - Archivio di Storia Della Cultura 20.
What Is Descriptive Psychology?Christian Damböck - 2020 - Hopos: The Journal of the International Society for the History of Philosophy of Science 10 (1):274-289.

Analytics

Added to PP
2015-02-04

Downloads
0

6 months
0

Historical graph of downloads

Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Gunter Scholtz
Ruhr-Universität Bochum

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references