Further remarks on property designators and rigidity (reply to lópez de sa's criticisms)

Grazer Philosophische Studien 76 (1):199-208 (2008)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Are all canonical property designators (i.e. nominalizations of predicative phrases) rigid? Dan López de Sa recently criticized the arguments I gave for an affirmative answer to that question. The current article rebuts López de Sa's objections.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 101,072

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Flexible property designators.Dan López De Sa - 2006 - Grazer Philosophische Studien 73 (1):221-230.
Are proper names rigid designators?Pierre Baumann - 2010 - Axiomathes 20 (2-3):333-346.
A Puzzle about Properties.Berit Brogaard - 2007 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 74 (3):635-650.
Common Nouns and Rigidity.Cem Şişkolar - 2014 - Dissertation, Bogazici University
Response to Dan López de Sa.John McDowell - 2006 - Teorema: International Journal of Philosophy 25 (1):211-214.
Rigid designation and theoretical identities.Joseph LaPorte - 2013 - Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Further Reflections on Sentences Saying of Themselves Strange Things.Elia Zardini - 2017 - Logic and Logical Philosophy 26 (4):563-581.
Names and Obstinate Rigidity.Brendan Murday - 2013 - Southern Journal of Philosophy 51 (2):224-242.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
52 (#419,040)

6 months
7 (#711,641)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Benjamin Schnieder
University of Vienna

Citations of this work

The Naïve Conception of Properties.Benjamin Schnieder - 2017 - Philosophical Issues 27 (1):322-342.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references