Progressive Specificity

Abstract

This paper is about progressive aspect. We defend a new principle that we call ‘Progressive Specificity’: if you are Ving and to V is to X or to Y, then you are Xing or you are Ying. We offer six arguments for Progressive Specificity. We then suggest that those six arguments extend to the futurative progressive. We conclude by comparing Progressive Specificity to Conditional Excluded Middle.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

  • Only published works are available at libraries.

Analytics

Added to PP
2024-06-19

Downloads
318 (#91,213)

6 months
151 (#31,029)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author Profiles

Nathaniel Baron-Schmitt
Center for Advanced Studies, Berlin: Human Abilities & Freie Universität Berlin
Ginger Schultheis
University of Chicago

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Indicative conditionals.Robert Stalnaker - 1975 - Philosophia 5 (3):269-286.
Verbs and times.Zeno Vendler - 1957 - Philosophical Review 66 (2):143-160.
The Meaning of "If".Justin Khoo - 2022 - New York, USA: Oxford University Press.
Fictional Reality.Kyle Blumberg & Ben Holguín - forthcoming - Philosophical Review.

View all 11 references / Add more references