Reunderstanding Anselm’s Argument

New Scholasticism 57 (3):384-409 (1983)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

ISBN(s)

00286621

DOI

10.5840/newscholas198357317

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 103,401

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

St. Anselm’s Ontological Argument and Russell’s Theory of Descriptions.Herbert Hochberg - 1959 - New Scholasticism 33 (3):319-330.
Confessions of a Rational Mystic: Anselm's Early Writings.Willemien Otten - 1996 - Journal of the History of Philosophy 34 (2):294-295.
Who is Anselm’s fool?Thomas O’Loughlin - 1989 - New Scholasticism 63 (3):313-325.
Anselm’s Response to Gaunilo’s Dilemma.Thomas A. Losoncy - 1982 - New Scholasticism 56 (2):207-216.
Knowledge According to Gregory of Rimini.Leo Donald Davis - 1981 - New Scholasticism 55 (3):331-347.
The Moral Act and Love of God According to Gregory of Rimini.L. D. Davis - 1988 - New Scholasticism 62 (1):42-71.
The Ontological Argument.R. J. Connelly - 1969 - New Scholasticism 43 (4):530-554.
The Cosmological Argument. [REVIEW]Stephen L. Weber - 1973 - New Scholasticism 47 (4):530-534.
A New Argument for the Existence of God.Robert A. Oakes - 1980 - New Scholasticism 54 (2):213-223.

Analytics

Added to PP
2011-12-02

Downloads
57 (#393,182)

6 months
7 (#469,699)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Gregory Schufreider
Louisiana State University

Citations of this work

The Possibility of a Christian Philosophy.John F. Wippel - 1984 - Faith and Philosophy 1 (3):272-290.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references