Science as Social Existence: Heidegger and the Sociology of Scientific Knowledge [Book Review]

International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 31 (4):432-435 (2017)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Volume 31, Issue 4, December 2017, Page 432-435.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 101,139

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Suppressed Subjectivity and Truncated Tradition: A Reply to Pablo Schyfter.Jeff Kochan - 2018 - Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 7 (12):15-21.
Heidegger Today: On Jeff Kochan's Science as Social Existence. [REVIEW]Paolo Palladino - 2018 - Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 7 (8):41-46.
The Very Being of a Conceptual Scheme: Disciplinary and Conceptual Critiques. [REVIEW]Adam Riggio - 2018 - Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 7 (11):53-59.
On the Sociology of Subjectivity: A Reply to Raphael Sassower.Jeff Kochan - 2018 - Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 7 (5):39-41.
Disassembling the System: A Reply to Paolo Palladino and Adam Riggio.Jeff Kochan - 2018 - Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 7 (12):29-38.
Understanding Scientific Progress: Aim-oriented Empiricism. [REVIEW]Shan Gao - 2017 - International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 31 (4):435-438.
Niels Bohr and the Philosophy of Physics: Twenty-first-century Perspectives. [REVIEW]Ana Rioja Nieto - 2017 - International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 31 (4):429-432.

Analytics

Added to PP
2019-04-10

Downloads
65 (#326,512)

6 months
11 (#350,815)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

We have never been modern.Bruno Latour - 1993 - Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Knowledge and Social Imagery.David Bloor - 1979 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 30 (2):195-199.

Add more references