Sensual Philosophy [Book Review]

Review of Metaphysics 58 (2):454-455 (2004)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

While candidates for political office avoid the “l” word like the plague, scholars have never been more interested in the appellation—not in its narrow partisan meaning, of course, but in its most capacious sense, a sense almost coextensive with modernity itself. Scholarship on the history of liberalism is thriving, especially inquiries into the theoretical foundations of the modern liberal order. The search for liberalism’s self-justification is regarded as a necessary response to the Nietzschean and postmodern challenges. If we want to hang on to our toleration and our other liberal delights, we had better be able to give some account of them.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive

    This entry is not archived by us. If you are the author and have permission from the publisher, we recommend that you archive it. Many publishers automatically grant permission to authors to archive pre-prints. By uploading a copy of your work, you will enable us to better index it, making it easier to find.

    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 101,628

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2011-01-09

Downloads
40 (#572,013)

6 months
5 (#1,094,604)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references