Why All US Medical Schools Have a Moral Obligation to Provide Abortion Training to Their Interested Students: A Necessary Response to Dobbs

International Journal of Feminist Approaches to Bioethics 17 (2):85-113 (2024)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Abortion is among the most widely disagreed upon topics in bioethics and healthcare. Consider how abortion is taught to medical students: while some medical schools incorporate abortion into their standard curriculum, others omit it entirely. In this article, the author argues these discrepancies go against society's interest in producing physicians with comprehensive medical knowledge—especially for common procedures like abortions. The author thus argues all US medical schools have a moral obligation to provide abortion education and clinical training opportunities to their students. For the sake of argumentation, the author attempts to justify this claim remaining morally neutral on abortion.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 100,793

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

The Two tragedies argument.William Simkulet - 2019 - Journal of Medical Ethics 45 (5):304-308.
Teaching Bioethics Today: Waking from Dogmatic Curricular Slumbers.Leonard M. Fleck - forthcoming - Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics:1-8.
The moral significance of spontaneous abortion.T. F. Murphy - 1985 - Journal of Medical Ethics 11 (2):79-83.

Analytics

Added to PP
2024-11-25

Downloads
4 (#1,853,741)

6 months
4 (#1,246,862)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references