- New
-
Topics
- All Categories
- Metaphysics and Epistemology
- Value Theory
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Logic and Philosophy of Logic
- Philosophy of Biology
- Philosophy of Cognitive Science
- Philosophy of Computing and Information
- Philosophy of Mathematics
- Philosophy of Physical Science
- Philosophy of Social Science
- Philosophy of Probability
- General Philosophy of Science
- Philosophy of Science, Misc
- History of Western Philosophy
- Philosophical Traditions
- Philosophy, Misc
- Other Academic Areas
- Journals
- Submit material
- More
Why does human twin research not produce results consistent with those from nonhuman animals?
Behavioral and Brain Sciences 10 (1):39-40 (1987)
Abstract
This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)Other Versions
No versions found
My notes
Similar books and articles
Why twin studies really don't tell us much about human heritability.Sidney J. Segalowitz - 1999 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 22 (5):904-905.
Of mice and men: Revisiting the relation of nonhuman and human learning.Holger Schultheis & Harald Lachnit - 2009 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 32 (2):224-225.
Do nonhuman animals commit suicide?William J. Hamilton - 1980 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 3 (2):278-279.
Where is the evidence for general intelligence in nonhuman animals?Ludwig Huber - 2017 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 40.
Drawing the line on metacognition.Janet Metcalfe - 2003 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 26 (3):350-351.
Using the research on intergroup conflict in nonhuman animals to help inform patterns of human intergroup conflict.Amanda R. Ridley & Melanie O. Mirville - 2019 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 42.
Taking symbols for granted? Is the discontinuity between human and nonhuman minds the product of external symbol systems?Gary Lupyan - 2008 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 31 (2):140-141.
Weighing the moral status of brain organoids and research animals.Julian J. Koplin - 2024 - Bioethics 38 (5):410-418.
On possible discontinuities between human and nonhuman minds.Edward A. Wasserman - 2008 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 31 (2):151-152.
Analytics
Added to PP
2014-01-20
Downloads
35 (#633,581)
6 months
7 (#665,875)
2014-01-20
Downloads
35 (#633,581)
6 months
7 (#665,875)
Historical graph of downloads
Citations of this work
Nature and nurture.Robert Plomin & C. S. Bergeman - 1991 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 14 (3):414-427.
The nature of nurture: Genetic influence on “environmental” measures.Robert Plomin & C. S. Bergeman - 1991 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 14 (3):373-386.
We wondered where the errors went.Peter H. Schönemann & Roberta D. Schönemann - 1991 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 14 (3):404-406.
Implications for behavior genetics research: No shared environment left?Dorret I. Boomsma & Peter C. M. Molenaar - 1991 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 14 (3):389-389.
Overinterpreting model fitting effects.Lee Willerman - 1991 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 14 (3):413-414.
References found in this work
Matrilineal inheritance: New theory and analysis.John Hartung - 1985 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 8 (4):661-670.
How much could we boost scholastic achievement and IQ scores? A direct answer from a French adoption study.Michel Schiff, Michel Duyme, Annick Dumaret & Stanislaw Tomkiewicz - 1982 - Cognition 12 (2):165-196.
A reinterpretation of the direction of effects in studies of socialization.Richard Q. Bell - 1968 - Psychological Review 75 (2):81-95.
The Autobiography of Charles Darwin and selected letters.Francis Darwin - 1960 - Les Etudes Philosophiques 15 (1):96-97.
Handbook of Mental Examination Methods.Shepherd I. Franz - 1913 - Philosophical Review 22 (3):336-336.
PhilPapers logo by Andrea Andrews and Meghan Driscoll.
This site uses cookies and Google Analytics (see our terms & conditions for details regarding the privacy implications). Use of this site is subject to terms & conditions.
All rights reserved by The PhilPapers Foundation
Server: philpapers-web-667477cd97-lxkd2 dc2