Ontological Constraints on Sublinguistic Cognitive Science

Idealistic Studies 29 (1-2):89-101 (1999)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Does the proper pursuit of cognitive science necessitate a devaluation of the ostensible phenomenon of linguistically framed conceptual thought? Paul Churchland has asserted the necessity of such devaluation forthrightly, and others have shown varying degrees of inclination in this direction.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 101,423

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Acceptance and devaluation: Nahmanides' attitude towards science.Y. Tzvi Langermann - 1992 - Journal of Jewish Thought and Philosophy 1 (2):223-245.
Churchlands and Their Critics.Robert McCauley (ed.) - 1996 - Cambridge, Mass.: Wiley-Blackwell.
Technologies and the Devaluation of What is Near.Hé José Huyke - 2003 - Techné: Research in Philosophy and Technology 6 (3):156-165.
Technologies and the Devaluation of What is Near.Hé José Huyke - 2003 - Techné: Research in Philosophy and Technology 6 (3):156-165.
Anthropology in Cognitive Science.Andrea Bender, Edwin Hutchins & Douglas Medin - 2010 - Topics in Cognitive Science 2 (3):374-385.
Hegel’s Triadic Doctrine of Cognitive Mind.Murray Greene - 1972 - Idealistic Studies 2 (3):208-228.

Analytics

Added to PP
2011-01-09

Downloads
14 (#1,286,464)

6 months
11 (#362,865)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references