Standards of evidence for designed sex differences

Behavioral and Brain Sciences 32 (3-4):289 (2009)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

At the heart of the debate between social role theorists and evolutionary psychologists is whether natural selection has designed the minds of the sexes differently to some interesting extent. In this commentary I describe the standards of evidence for both the positive and negative claims. In my opinion, Archer has met the standard for designed sex differences in intrasexual conflict

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 100,154

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Sex differences in the developmental antecedents of aggression.Joseph M. Boden - 2009 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 32 (3-4):269-270.
Moderators of sex differences in sexual selection theory.Anthony D. Pellegrini - 2009 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 32 (3-4):285 - 286.
Sex, sex differences, and the new polygyny.John Marshall Townsend - 2005 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 28 (2):295-296.
Some reflections on sex differences in aggression and violence.Stephen C. Maxson - 1999 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 22 (2):232-233.

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-10-27

Downloads
97 (#215,063)

6 months
11 (#323,137)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references