Learning by abduction: A geometrical interpretation

Semiotica 2005 (157):199-212 (2005)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This paper posits Peirce’s logical category of abduction as a necessary component in the learning process. Because of the cardinality of categories, Thirdness always contains in itself the Firstness of abduction. In psychological terms, abduction can be interpreted as intuition or insight. The paper suggests that abduction can be modeled as a vector on a complex plane. Such geometrical interpretation of the triadic sign helps to clarify the paradox of new knowledge that haunted us since Plato first articulated it in his Meno dialogue. Some implications for the actual teaching practice are addressed, and the value of practical knowledge affirmed.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 100,063

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2014-01-17

Downloads
18 (#1,100,247)

6 months
4 (#1,232,162)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

References found in this work

The taming of chance.Ian Hacking - 1990 - New York: Cambridge University Press.
Understanding John Dewey: Nature and Cooperative Intelligence.James Campbell - 1995 - Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society 31 (3):660-670.
John Dewey's theory of practical reasoning.Jim Garrison - 1999 - Educational Philosophy and Theory 31 (3):291–312.
Sign, Textuality, World.Floyd Merrell - 1994 - Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society 30 (2):456-460.

Add more references