Action, Description, Redescription and Concept Change: A Reply to Fuller and Roth

History of the Human Sciences 16 (2):101-115 (2003)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 100,793

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-11-22

Downloads
99 (#208,729)

6 months
9 (#433,641)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Wes Sharrock
Victoria University of Manchester

Citations of this work

Under a Redescription.Kevin McMillan - 2003 - History of the Human Sciences 16 (2):129-150.
Descriptive Accuracy in History: The Case of Narrative Explanations.Leonidas Tsilipakos - 2020 - Philosophy of the Social Sciences 50 (4):283-312.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Intention.G. E. M. Anscombe - 1957 - Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 57:321-332.
Ways of pastmaking.Paul A. Roth - 2002 - History of the Human Sciences 15 (4):125-143.
Making up the past: a response to Sharrock and Leudar.Steve Fuller - 2002 - History of the Human Sciences 15 (4):115-123.

Add more references