Alexander of Aphrodisias on Divine Providence: Two Problems

Classical Quarterly 32 (1):198-211 (1982)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The position on the question of divine providence of the Aristotelian commentator Alexander of Aphrodisias (fl. c. A.D. 200) is of particular interest. It marks an attempt to find avia mediabetween the Epicurean denial of any divine concern for the world, on the one hand, and the Stoic view that divine providence governs it in every detail, on the other.2As an expression of such a middle course it finds a place in later classifications of views concerning providence.3It is also of topical interest: Alexander's fullest discussion, in his treatiseDe providentia (On Providence)(surviving only in two Arabic versions), has only recently been edited and translated,4although some aspects of his position had long been known from other texts preserved in Greek.5.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 100,440

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2010-12-09

Downloads
80 (#260,011)

6 months
7 (#681,649)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Creation and Divine Providence in Plotinus.Christopher Noble & Nathan Powers - 2015 - In Anna Marmodoro & Brian D. Prince (eds.), Causation and Creation in Late Antiquity. Cambridge, United Kingdom: Cambridge University Press. pp. 51-70.
La providencia de los dioses según Alejandro de Afrodisias.David Torrijos-Castrillejo - 2020 - Logos. Anales Del Seminario de Metafísica [Universidad Complutense de Madrid, España] 53:345-365.

View all 9 citations / Add more citations

References found in this work

Aristotle's Metaphysics. Aristotle - 1966 - Clarendon Press.
Aristotle's philosopher-God.Richard Norman - 1969 - Phronesis 14 (1):63-74.
The Physical World of Late Antiquity.S. Sambursky - 1962 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 14 (53):63-65.

View all 7 references / Add more references