Debunking the skeptics

Abstract

is not about traditional skeptical thinkers like Descartes and Hume. Instead, it is about some of the ideas of today’s ”skeptics” — people who try to debunk things that seem too odd or too spiritual. This site is not meant to encourage weird beliefs, but it might make you wonder whether skepticism is a weird belief too

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

  • Only published works are available at libraries.

My notes

Similar books and articles

Debunking the skeptics.Jason Turner - manuscript
Skeptical Hypotheses and Moral Skepticism.Joshua May - 2013 - Canadian Journal of Philosophy 43 (3):341-359.
Skeptical Influences on Hume's View of Animal Reasoning.Richard J. Fry - 2019 - Hume Studies 42 (1):137-165.
The Skeptic and the Climate Change Skeptic.Alex Worsnip - 2021 - In Michael Hannon & Jeroen de Ridder (eds.), The Routledge Handbook of Political Epistemology. New York: Routledge.
Responding to Skepticism About Doxastic Agency.Miriam Schleifer McCormick - 2018 - Erkenntnis 83 (4):627-645.
Descartes and Skepticism.Raman Sachdev - 2019 - Humanities Bulletin 2 (1):71-84.
Kant’s Offer to the Skeptical Empiricist.Charles Goldhaber - 2024 - Journal of the History of Philosophy 62 (3):421–47.
The Purpose of Philosophy.F. B. Jevons - 1926 - Humana Mente 1 (1):69-77.
Introspection and inference.Nicholas Silins - 2013 - Philosophical Studies 163 (2):291-315.
Kudos for the Mindless Expert.Sebastian Benthall - 2007 - Critical Review: A Journal of Politics and Society 19 (1):65-79.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
257 (#103,895)

6 months
61 (#93,097)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references