- New
-
Topics
- All Categories
- Metaphysics and Epistemology
- Value Theory
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Logic and Philosophy of Logic
- Philosophy of Biology
- Philosophy of Cognitive Science
- Philosophy of Computing and Information
- Philosophy of Mathematics
- Philosophy of Physical Science
- Philosophy of Social Science
- Philosophy of Probability
- General Philosophy of Science
- Philosophy of Science, Misc
- History of Western Philosophy
- Philosophical Traditions
- Philosophy, Misc
- Other Academic Areas
- Journals
- Submit material
- More
Explanatory burdens and natural law: Invoking a field description of perception-action
Behavioral and Brain Sciences 24 (5):905-906 (2001)
Abstract
Although we agree with Hommel et al. that perception and action refer to one another, we disagree that they do so via a code. Gibson (1966; 1979) attempted to frame perception-action as a field phenomenon rather than as a particle phenomenon. From such a perspective, perception and action are adjoint, mutually interacting through an information field, and codes are unnecessary.Author's Profile
Other Versions
No versions found
My notes
Similar books and articles
Perception-action as reciprocal, continuous, and prospective.Jeffrey B. Wagman - 2008 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 31 (2):219-220.
Perception and action planning: Getting it together.David A. Westwood & Melvyn A. Goodale - 2001 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 24 (5):907-908.
TEC: Integrated view of perception and action or framework for response selection?Robert W. Proctor & Kim-Phuong L. Vu - 2001 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 24 (5):899-900.
The event-code: Not the solution to a problem, but a problem to be solved.Michael J. Richardson & Claire F. Michaels - 2001 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 24 (5):901-902.
Unifying by binding: Will binding really bind?Jörn Diedrichsen & Eliot Hazeltine - 2001 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 24 (5):884-885.
Multi-level sensorimotor interactions.Stefan Vogt & Heiko Hecht - 2001 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 24 (5):906-907.
The theory of event coding (TEC): A framework for perception and action planning.Bernhard Hommel, Jochen Müsseler, Gisa Aschersleben & Wolfgang Prinz - 2001 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 24 (5):849-878.
Action-oriented representation.Pete Mandik - 2005 - In Andrew Brook & Kathleen Akins (eds.), Cognition and the Brain: The Philosophy and Neuroscience Movement. New York: Cambridge University Press. pp. 284--305.
A common framework for perception and action: Neuroimaging evidence.Thierry Chaminade & Jean Decety - 2001 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 24 (5):879-882.
Consciousness for perception and for action: A perspective from unconscious binding.Zhicheng Lin - 2016 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 39.
Analytics
Added to PP
2009-01-28
Downloads
60 (#351,038)
6 months
10 (#379,980)
2009-01-28
Downloads
60 (#351,038)
6 months
10 (#379,980)
Historical graph of downloads
Author's Profile
Citations of this work
Mental and sensorimotor extrapolation fare better than motion extrapolation in the offset condition.Dirk Kerzel & Jochen Müsseler - 2008 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 31 (2):206-207.
Perception-action as reciprocal, continuous, and prospective.Jeffrey B. Wagman - 2008 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 31 (2):219-220.
PhilPapers logo by Andrea Andrews and Meghan Driscoll.
This site uses cookies and Google Analytics (see our terms & conditions for details regarding the privacy implications). Use of this site is subject to terms & conditions.
All rights reserved by The PhilPapers Foundation
Server: philpapers-web-667477cd97-2pm92 dc2