Hume's Moral Theory?

History of Philosophy Quarterly 12 (3):317 - 331 (1995)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Hume's moral theory is often taken to be descriptive rather then normative. This is a misinterpretation: Hume justifies moral claims, as he justifies claims about what to believe, by appeal to initially credible cases. This procedure is defensible

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 101,459

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Hume's Moral Theory. [REVIEW]Jonathan Harrison - 1982 - Hume Studies 8 (1):70-85.
Hume's Moral Theory. [REVIEW]Donald Livingston - 1982 - Teaching Philosophy 5 (1):65-66.
Hume's Moral Theory. [REVIEW]I. M. Fowlie - 1981 - Philosophical Books 22 (2):95-97.
Hume’s Moral Theory.Gayne Nerney - 1981 - International Studies in Philosophy 13 (2):106-107.
Hume’s Moral Theory. [REVIEW]Gayne Nerney - 1981 - International Studies in Philosophy 13 (2):106-107.
Hume's Moral Theory.Judith Slein - 1982 - Philosophical Review 91 (2):269.
Hume’s Moral Theory.John Leslie Mackie - 1980 - Boston: Routledge.
Partiality in Hume's moral theory.Dorothy Coleman - 1992 - Journal of Value Inquiry 26 (1):95-104.
J.L. Mackie, Hume's Moral Theory. [REVIEW]Nicholas Capaldi - 1983 - Journal of the History of Philosophy 21 (2):250-252.
J.L. Mackie, Hume's Moral Theory. [REVIEW]Trudy Govier - 1981 - Philosophy in Review 1:162-166.

Analytics

Added to PP
2011-05-29

Downloads
44 (#511,294)

6 months
4 (#1,272,377)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Rob Shaver
University of Manitoba

Citations of this work

Prescription, Description, and Hume's Experimental Method.Hsueh Qu - 2016 - British Journal for the History of Philosophy 24 (2):279-301.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references