Killing in War and Moral Equality

Journal of Moral Philosophy 8 (4):495-512 (2011)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Do innocent civilians who will be killed in a justified attack on a nearby military target have a right to defend themselves by shooting down the bomber pilot? I argue that they do not, and that Jeff McMahan's view that they do have such a right—that there is a moral equivalence between pilot and civilian—is flawed in much the same way that Michael Walzer's moral equivalence of combatants—a position that McMahan has so persuasively refuted—is flawed

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 103,449

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2011-11-17

Downloads
68 (#325,891)

6 months
4 (#909,732)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

References found in this work

The basis of moral liability to defensive killing.Jeff McMahan - 2005 - Philosophical Issues 15 (1):386–405.
Killing in self‐defense.Jonathan Quong - 2009 - Ethics 119 (3):507-537.
Abortion and self-defense.Nancy Davis - 1984 - Philosophy and Public Affairs 13 (3):175-207.
The Just War and the Gulf War.Jeff McMahan & Robert McKim - 1993 - Canadian Journal of Philosophy 23 (4):501 - 541.

Add more references